True Neutral:Rules and guidelines

Every mainspace page on True Neutral must abide to the following rules:
 * 1) It must not be biased towards a particular point of view. It must not use subjective terms, that is, anything that can be perceived as biased. We ignore Wikipedia's concept of "false balance".
 * 2) * Potentially biased terms or statements must be rewritten with attribution. For example: "according to a study by university X, video games influence on violence" instead of just "video games influence on violence". The use of sources, or how reliable they are, does not affect this rule. Without attribution, articles must not call a person or group something they have never used to describe themselves.
 * 3) It must be written in serious language, without the use of comedy or sarcasm.
 * 4) It must be written in formal and objective language and conform to standard grammar. Outside quotations or metalinguistics, words like "you", colloquialisms, and slang must not be used.
 * 5) The subject must be reasonably notable. True Neutral neither follows a stringent policy of notability like Wikipedia, nor eliminates it completely like WikiAlpha.
 * 6) It must not deliberately omit important information on the subject. Unbiased does not mean censored or incomplete. Instead, if there is controversy around the subject, all versions must be presented if possible.
 * 7) It must conform to our host's rules as well. If, someday, for some reason, we are unable to follow the above rules because of some imposition by our host, True Neutral shall migrate to another host.

None of these rules apply to non-mainspace pages, such as talk pages and user pages. Outside articles, users are free to express their opinions. Also, meta pages, such as this one, might be understood as appealing to neutrality and saying that other wikis are not neutral, which itself would be a point of view, so they are also excluded (on the other hand, a mainspace article about True Neutral should state that it claims to be neutral, and not that it is neutral).

Besides the rules, there are also the following recommendations and guidelines:
 * Try to present every notable view on a subject. Unlike Wikipedia articles, True Neutral articles must treat every view, including religious views and minority views on science, in the same weight.
 * Very controversial or stigmatized views, such as that the moon landings were a hoax, that the Earth is flat or that the Holocaust did not happen, are not exceptions precisely because they are the ones that lack neutrality the most, since almost anything that can be found about them either condemn or promote them.
 * If we face concerns with views that can potentially make neutrality semantically impractical, we shall discuss those concerns and try to find a solution only when they appear, instead of adopting preemptive practices of doubtful efficacy. One extreme example would be a philosophical view under which nothing really exists - in this case, every statement that something exists, in every article, could be judged as biased.